That’s me memeing a guy before you who said that exact quote, I thought it was funny that’s it.
https://perpheads.com/threads/ban-dispute-steelo.58120/post-436293
The rules are clear:
It seems like ever since I double crossed your set up at office DD to which you immediately broke 3.4, your...
Starting off a rebuttal with accusing me of being mad as a response to me exposing an illogicality in your argument does not really help you out here.
I was never "mad," I said it's ironic that you used the realism argument because, Like I explained already, the security upgrade makes your...
this is irrelevant, you're using the argument of people farming org rep with a friend's car as your main point as to why security upgrades should be on every car in the city for a $500 pocket change charge upon joining.
I'll simplify my point to you and repeat it.
>player join server
>player...
Your Steam Name: MalekIsWeird
Your Roleplay Name: Omar Asfour
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:137872891
Player's Steam Name: EDWARLDO
Player's Roleplay Name: Edwarldo Rodreguez
Player's SteamID: STEAM_0:1:805548362
Why should this player be punished?: Broke multiple rules. Unrealistic actions...
yes it is "abuse" to do a crime that is mechanically efficient in growing your org reputation because you desire org reputation :troll:
If I'm being real, i don't like the security upgrade, It's just straight up powergaming by definition.
it's essentially paying chump change to make your car...
https://perpheads.com/threads/trophy-request-malekisweird.58686/
This trophy request had evidence of me deserving the Gungame trophy, yet when it was archived I never received the trophy?
but that's just not how the rules are enforced at all.
There was an incident where me and a friend gunpointed a victim selling with a revolver on passive while we had automatics aimed at him cornering him at docks within point-blank range. When he was reported for retaliating and getting...
under 3.4 guide, he did not initially.
Having a weapon in passive exempts you from obeying orders under gunpoint no matter how stupid it would be to resist. This is why I am opening a discussion to highlight the irony and gauge the community's opinions while stating mine.
Personally, I think...
If an individual is selling drugs, then they are gunpointed from behind by a person or a group while the victim is distracted with a weapon on passive, should he be allowed to resist?
In my opinion, the current exemption to gunpoint in the 3.4 guide is a bit dishonest to the general idea of 3.4...